Review



mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 94
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Bioss mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin
    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the <t>α</t> <t>ν</t> β 3 <t>integrin</t> on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs
    Mouse Polyclonal α ν β 3 Integrin, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 54 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 54 article reviews
    mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging"

    Article Title: Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

    Journal: Molecular Imaging and Biology

    doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-01988-4

    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs
    Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Injection

    α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)
    Figure Legend Snippet: α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry



    Similar Products

    mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin  (Bioss)
    94
    Bioss mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin
    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the <t>α</t> <t>ν</t> β 3 <t>integrin</t> on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs
    Mouse Polyclonal α ν β 3 Integrin, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs

    Journal: Molecular Imaging and Biology

    Article Title: Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

    doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-01988-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs

    Article Snippet: Placental sections were incubated with mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin (1:200 dilution, Bioss antibodies, bs‐1310R) and secondary HRP-polymer (Rabbit-On-Rodent HRP-polymer, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Injection

    α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)

    Journal: Molecular Imaging and Biology

    Article Title: Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

    doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-01988-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)

    Article Snippet: Placental sections were incubated with mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin (1:200 dilution, Bioss antibodies, bs‐1310R) and secondary HRP-polymer (Rabbit-On-Rodent HRP-polymer, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry